If the Foundation learns that a grant recipient has or may have violated the Foundation’s Standards, the claim will be submitted to the grant recipient for comment.
If a decision made by a relevant body indicates that the Foundation’s Standards have been violated, or if the Foundation otherwise deems that the Standards have been violated, the Foundation may discontinue payment during the grant period and the Foundation may require the repayment of funding already disbursed.
The Foundation may decide to deny future funding to the grant recipient.
UPDATED FEBRUARY 11, 2015 BY JXPL
 Examples: The Swedish Research Council (2006) ‘Good Research Practice – What is it?’; The Danish Agency for Science Technology and Innovation (2009) ‘Guidelines for Good Research Practice’; Medical Research Council (2005) ‘Good Research Practice’.
 The Nuremberg Code, see http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/archive/nurcode.html
 Declaration of Helsinki, see the website of the World Medical Association, http://www.wma.net/, http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html
 Danish Animal Experiment Inspectorate regulations, see http://www.foedevarestyrelsen.dk/fvst_ansvar_opgaver/Sider/Dyreforsoegstilsynet.aspx (in Danish)
 The UN convention against corruption, see the website for the United Nations, Office of Drugs and Crime, http://www.unodc.org/ og http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/corruption/index.html?ref=menuside